|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
EnglishArcher
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:12 am Post subject: Was the right-hand cylinder cover a 'found' piece? |
|
|
I've been puzzling over this for a while now...
It's been known for a long time now that most of the components of the blaster were sourced from somewhere else - Steyr receiver, Bulldog frame, and so on.
Most of the components that were made specifically for the weapon, for example the grips and grip frame, are reasonably 'obvious' designs (notwithstanding the use of amber resin for the grips!), with quite straightforward geometries. In other words, there the sort of designs you can imagine a sci-fi gun-designer coming up with.
The right-hand cylinder cover, though, strikes me as a bit of an oddity. It is a very convoluted shape - the curves and fluting at the back end, the compound curves, the 'flange' on the bottom edge. It doesn't look 'hi-tech'; in fact it almost looks out of place on the weapon (familiarity has just made it look 'right'), its curvilinear shape in contrast to the rest of the gun's mostly rectilinear design. To me, it just doesn't look like the sort of thing a sci-fi gun-designer would invent, given the choice.
I can imagine it would be a nightmare to machine from solid (as a one-off)
Is there a possibility, then, that the cover was, in fact, a found piece? Modified by the gun maker (for example, milling a slot for the Steyr bolt handle) to fit the other components. It might explain details like why the Bulldog cylinder is exposed when the Steyr bolt handle is lifted.
The BIG question of course then becomes: if it is a found part, what was it originally? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
racprops Community Member
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is a good question, I think it was made, after all the 44 has a large cylinder and it fits so right, I think they made it into a more custom shape so that it would help hide the fact we are looking at a revolver.
They do that alot now a days in Hollywood, covers and add ons to hide the real guns.
But I could be wrong so keep looking everyone.
My 2 cents.
RIch _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
EnglishArcher
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree - the part is almost definitely there to hide the cylinder.
On the left side the cylinder cover is fairly conventional: it covers the cylinder; and it has that (ubiquitous) sci-fi plant on (the t-shaped panel) It's pretty much what I'd expect: complex enough to disguise the underlying components, but reasonably straightforward in shape
It's the shape of the right-hand cover I find so extraordinary. Who, when asked to come up with a sci-fi gun design would think of that shape? It's too fluid, too artistic to be traditional 'sci-fi'
I keep coming back to shotgun components. Classic, side-by-side or over-and-under, sporting shotguns. Certainly, manufacturers of shotguns would be prepared to invest the time in creating aesthetically pleasing shapes. It would also fit in with the rest of the manufacturing ethos of the gun: basing it on existing, available (and not necessarily cheap) real-world gun parts wherever possible
I'm thinking shotgun receivers, like this:
Last edited by EnglishArcher on Mon Apr 28, 2008 6:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
The Loyalizer Community Member
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 742 Location: Down in 4th Sector, Chinatown
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EnglishArcher wrote: | It's the shape of the right-hand cover I find so extraordinary. Who, when asked to come up with a sci-fi gun design would think of that shape? It's too fluid, too artistic to be 'sci-fi' |
Well we know Ridley was looking at a lot of sci-fi imagery such as the works of Mobius ect, and may have suggested it be something fluid and styllized. Its possible that they went with a similar style when they came up with that part. They also probably had to solve two design problems: 1. make a shap that would hide the revolver cylinder without impeding its movement, and 2. a shape that integrates with the steyr bolt handle.
I agree its not necessarily a shape that is typically sci fi, but then again 25 years ago alot of sci fi designs were more fluid in shape and less mechanistic. Designing a weapon to look both functional and realistically plausible is tougher than it sounds, especially when you're trying to avoid having it look like a contemporary weapon. Its a problem I come up against routinely when doing concept art that features high tech or futuristic weapons. _________________
"We began to recognize in them a strange obsession..."
http://fcomin.cgsociety.org/gallery/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
EnglishArcher
Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, the Mobius connection makes a lot of sense. I can see the shape appearing as a result of his influence.
It could have appeared as a direct contrast to the very rectilinear Sid Mead designs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Noeland Community Guide
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 1328
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
My thought would be that if it is a found piece of some kind, it's highly modified, altered, and customized to work for the blaster.
I don't think she's a found piece though. _________________ I don't have enough blasters! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
andy Community Guide
Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 6237 Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The fact that the 'design lines' at the top of it do not match where seperated by the lever, but are paralell lead me toward custom. I also agree that it does not completely 'jive' with any other elements of the gun, but it does seem to me to have been sculpted out of clay at one point. I am only slightly leaning toward custom, but I am hoping that it is a found piece.
andy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Noeland Community Guide
Joined: 24 Oct 2006 Posts: 1328
|
Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there anything out there in the world that even resembles the side cover? Either of the side covers?
I think if there is, guys, lets start posting pics and breaking it down.
_________________ I don't have enough blasters! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|