 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:39 pm Post subject: Changing the serial number on a Steyr receiver |
|
|
Well It seems I might be purchasing the Bulldog from a friend who's had one here in CA all along (so its CA legal).
Now I'm looking around for the Steyr and I was wondering about the serial number and what to do about it.
First, Is it legal to alter the serial number on the receiver after the receiver has been de-milled (I'm assuming that once the Steyr receiver has been altered to fit the Bulldog its pretty much irreversibly destroyed as a firearm?)
How hard is it to do?
How hard is it to do right?
Has anyone here ever done it?
Helder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Robotprops Community Member

Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 280 Location: Vancouver, B.C.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Once you modify the receiver it becomes a deactivated firearm. You must have it certified as such by a gunsmith and then the gov. will recognize it as such. You may then attempt to change the serial number on gun steel. You will find this to be an effort in futility. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
joberg Community Member
.jpg)
Joined: 06 Oct 2008 Posts: 9463
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good luck Helder trying to change that serial number on that piece (unless you want to spend thousands on a special dye/hard steel to re-stamp it). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, I didn't think it would be that hard. When a gunsmith re-chambers a barrel he will typically file off or fill in the old markings and stamp on the new caliber info onto the barrel. Cant see it being too different for the receiver unless the metal on the barrel and the receiver are very different. I thought the hard part might be finding the lettering stamps such as these
http://www.midwayusa.com/viewproduct/?productnumber=553351
but with the correct font. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
racprops Community Member

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I tried and came more or less empty, the three with it 7 top is very hard to fine in the right size, I ended up have a stamping tool made, it is too soft for steel but works fine on Pewter and Plastic.
If you lucky and get a Steyr with a 4 digit number you closer to home, it should have the serial number and the import stamps in a straight line, a 5 digit can have the import stamps below the number…
You really need a older 4 digit model then all you need do to stamp in the new numbers…
Again you will end up with a lower section after grinding off the original numbers…
Most people just leave the original numbers and say it is his other gun…
Rich _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Bwood Community Member
Joined: 20 Sep 2009 Posts: 843
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Most people just leave the original numbers and say it is his other gun… |
Funny!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I just got this one off gunbroker. Its a four digit and Ill have to get a .222 mag for it since its a .223 rifle. The proof marks are not in line with the serial number unfortunately but Ive never actually seen one that was except for the one used the movie.
The good news is that in 1969 the receivers and mag housings for .222 and .223 rifles were identical (the BR Blaster used a 68 receiver) and has the same parts with the same part numbers. Well at least that parts that matter anyway. This rifle has the correct markings on the other side of the receiver and has the correct trigger guard mag release.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
racprops Community Member

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
|
Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I will be darned, 4 digits and still the other stamps are under...
I was told most were inline...
And yes the rest looks good.
Rich _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Robotprops Community Member

Joined: 11 Apr 2010 Posts: 280 Location: Vancouver, B.C.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is a beautiful piece, but the fact remains that you cannot change the serial on an existing receiver. If you want a screen accurate piece you need to have it declared as a deactivated receiver and then attempt to alter the serial number.
If you're ok with the existing serial number, then you are way ahead. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know that it would be illegal to change the number on a non-formally deactivated receiver.
I'm actually OK with the number. I'm still deciding if I'm OK with the location of the proof marks. Altering the location of those would not be illegal if I decided to do so. I wonder if they could be engraved instead of stamped.
In fact, I found out that if it is even legal to change the location of the serial number on a functional receiver as long as the numbers remain the same. Not that this gun needs it, I just thought it interesting that it is in fact legal. I guess it makes sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
BeastMaster Community Member

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 995 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why go through the hassle of trying to match the hero's serial?
You've got a unique serial of your own (on the receiver and the mag) so you should consider making this your own personalised version of the blaster. Those markings are like birth marks for that piece, so you should carry them off with your blaster build just like the ones on the hero. I think filling in and engraving the markings would be a big mistake and would probably result in ruining the shape/surface of the receiver. Plus you will never have them look as good as the original ones.
Personally If I was to use original parts I would love to have my own unique markings on the blaster. The prop has been copied so many times that to be honest it would be boring to have just another clone of the hero. Why not make your own hero? _________________ "F*ck it, it's just a movie. Let him worry about it" Harrison Ford |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Staar Community Member

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 757 Location: AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
BeastMaster wrote: | Why go through the hassle of trying to match the hero's serial?
You've got a unique serial of your own (on the receiver and the mag) so you should consider making this your own personalised version of the blaster. Those markings are like birth marks for that piece, so you should carry them off with your blaster build just like the ones on the hero. I think filling in and engraving the markings would be a big mistake and would probably result in ruining the shape/surface of the receiver. Plus you will never have them look as good as the original ones.
Personally If I was to use original parts I would love to have my own unique markings on the blaster. The prop has been copied so many times that to be honest it would be boring to have just another clone of the hero. Why not make your own hero? |
I have to agree with Beast on this… Unique is especially good and due to the fact that matching the original's markings on an already stamped receiver is going to be a challenge unto its self I wonder why the need to change…
One of my favorite replica's is the blaster by DeckB26354 because while its strictly not screen accurate, to my eye its a magnificent and unique interpretation of the blaster
(See his original thread here: http://www.propsummit.com/viewtopic.php?t=643&highlight= )
Looking forward to seeing how you get on..
Good luck and regards
MARK _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
propsjonnyb Community Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would agree with most of the opinions here , it is too much of a hassle changing the serial number to match without damaging the upper receiver , keeping it original is much more in keeping with the notion of a manufacturing run in the future an means you will have a more 'unique' piece , by all means have a Coyle 'upper reciever' if you want a 'film accurate' version but don't try to do-it -yourself at home - you need a professional to do a really good job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, like I said, I'm happy with the numbers. It's my gun not his lol. It's the location of the proofs that are bothering me a bit. I might get over it. Even if I don't I wouldn't try to change them myself, I'd have a gunsmith do it. A gunsmith does not file of material to remove the numbers btw. He fills them in with steel and smooths the surface back then re-blues. You can not tell once it is done.
As you can see on DeckB26354's gun, he was lucky and his proofs are all aligned with the numbers. Looks soooo much better that way, doesn't it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
propsjonnyb Community Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both Rich and I are enough of a 'gunsmith' to go professional if we ever wanted to and as both he and I have tried to do exactly what you are proposing, on several occasions , please just let me just say , it is not an easy thing to do and would be expensive ( if you went to a professional) and it can go horribly wrong . As an example I have just had returned to me a ( pewter ) upper reciever , - granted it's a completely different softer metal - but the individual concerned and I mention no names , tried to use a tool unsuitable for the job in hand and in probably five seconds, completely took all the markings off one side leaving it with deep ridge striations down one side and totally un-repairable , now this individual is well knowledged and an excellent modeller in fact I consider him very good and it should never have happened - but it did , Your Styer rifle is built using a special ten ton rotary mandrel inside and out to make the barrel bore, particularly where the barrel meets the upper receiver, so if you knew anything at all about how this rifle was made originally, you wouldn't even contemplate for a single second what you are proposing, if you don't believe a word I said - speak to the members who have actually have converted Styer upper recievers they'll tell you who's right and whose wrong. I'm not saying it can't be done but amateurs shouldn't attempt it and I don't mean any disrespect to any amateur's here in fact the opposite's true - but you're getting into 'real' gunsmithing and that really should be left to the professional's. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
propsjonnyb Community Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry , but to make my point clearer look at the first photo you've shown , especially look at the point where the barrel joins the reciever, you can see the striations on the barrel I was referring to in my post formed by the barrel mandrel , now the barrel screws into the upper reciever at this point - with one of the longest threads 57mm used - this means that there is less steel to work with where the markers stamped , and you need ten tons of pressure and a very special die stamp to mark that steel at that point without damaging the upper receiver , then you have to mill out a 'new' channel for both the ' new bolt' and your 'new' .44 CNC steel barrel as the old ones have to be discarded , so it fits 100% perfectly aligned to your CA gun frame to allow it to fire , you're original upper reciever is now a piece of non- functioning 'cosmetic' art attached to your 'working Bulldog , the addition of now putting a /functioning bolt' back in means just more work !!
Last edited by propsjonnyb on Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
joberg Community Member
.jpg)
Joined: 06 Oct 2008 Posts: 9463
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
To reiterate what others (specially Propjonnyb) the original screen used weapon was so expensive and difficult to built that they made just one hero gun . So to do what you want with the markings is best left to pros...sure, it's expensive but, at least, it'll result into something you really want and won't destroy your weapon in the process. (my 2 cents). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Helder22 Community Member
Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Relax guys. If you read my posts again you will notice that I did say that IF I decided to have the proofs (Im not touching the numbers btw), moved I'd have a gunsmith do it. Not just any gunsmith either. After all the time and effort I'd get the best professional I could find to do the job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Author |
Message |
Staar Community Member

Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 757 Location: AUSTRALIA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helder22 wrote: | Relax guys. If you read my posts again you will notice that I did say that IF I decided to have the proofs (Im not touching the numbers btw), moved I'd have a gunsmith do it. Not just any gunsmith either. After all the time and effort I'd get the best professional I could find to do the job. |
LOL… You see the passion this weapon creates!!
Kind regards
MARK _________________
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |